Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15201 - 15210 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 15201 - 15210 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. In April 2007
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493436 - 2022-03-16
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. In April 2007
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493436 - 2022-03-16
[PDF]
State v. William A. Spring
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10157 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10157 - 2017-09-19
Loretta M. Gilmeister v. Eugene Zdroik & Sons, Inc.
and crop insurance and, later, the real estate. Ag Services did not do a title search before taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
and crop insurance and, later, the real estate. Ag Services did not do a title search before taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
LBY and Associates, Inc. v. Warren Lee Brandt
declining to reopen the case did not "adhere to any rule with an eye to serving justice." This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15916 - 2005-03-31
declining to reopen the case did not "adhere to any rule with an eye to serving justice." This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Clinton L. Duhm
for operating with a suspended license and a violation of the absolute sobriety law. During an ensuing search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6098 - 2017-09-19
for operating with a suspended license and a violation of the absolute sobriety law. During an ensuing search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6098 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
,” and therefore Wis. Stat. § 767.451(3) applied to this case rather than § 767.451(1).[3] ¶7 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81584 - 2012-04-30
,” and therefore Wis. Stat. § 767.451(3) applied to this case rather than § 767.451(1).[3] ¶7 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81584 - 2012-04-30
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
v. Richards, 123 Wis.2d 1, 365 N.W.2d 7 (1985). For cases which fall in the “twilight zone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
v. Richards, 123 Wis.2d 1, 365 N.W.2d 7 (1985). For cases which fall in the “twilight zone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
tactics in this case. As to the first issue, again, it comes down to credibility. And here I find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92203 - 2013-01-28
tactics in this case. As to the first issue, again, it comes down to credibility. And here I find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92203 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
. On March 23, 1998, members of the State Line Area Narcotics Team (SLANT) executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
. On March 23, 1998, members of the State Line Area Narcotics Team (SLANT) executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
. On March 23, 1998, members of the State Line Area Narcotics Team (SLANT) executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
. On March 23, 1998, members of the State Line Area Narcotics Team (SLANT) executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31