Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, has acknowledged arguments for both the discretionary standard as well as de novo review, and it has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
, has acknowledged arguments for both the discretionary standard as well as de novo review, and it has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6835 - 2005-03-31
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6835 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roland A. Smart
in smaller counties were allowed to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
in smaller counties were allowed to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l, Ltd. v. Board of Adjustment for Dane County, 60 Wis.2d 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l, Ltd. v. Board of Adjustment for Dane County, 60 Wis.2d 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
Gerald T. Schaetz v. Town of Scott
of law this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Milwaukee County Cir. Ct., 176 Wis.2d 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13792 - 2005-03-31
of law this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Milwaukee County Cir. Ct., 176 Wis.2d 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
Wilma Wendt v. United Government Services
] ¶5 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7113 - 2005-03-31
] ¶5 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Christina Bellon v. Ripon College
is de novo. Gross v. Woodman’s Food Mkt., Inc., 2002 WI App 295, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 181, 655 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7330 - 2017-09-20
is de novo. Gross v. Woodman’s Food Mkt., Inc., 2002 WI App 295, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 181, 655 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7330 - 2017-09-20