Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 30164 for de.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 30164 for de.
[PDF]
David L. Gilbert v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. § 71.75. Statutory No. 00-2154 4 interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2903 - 2017-09-19
. § 71.75. Statutory No. 00-2154 4 interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2903 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Garel v. Kenneth Morgan
of statutory interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation is one that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15672 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation is one that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15672 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
Paul McGee v. Carlos R. Bates
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7411 - 2005-03-31
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John E. Taylor
is a legal conclusion, not a finding of fact, and thus our review is de No. 98-0417-CR 5 novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13626 - 2017-09-21
is a legal conclusion, not a finding of fact, and thus our review is de No. 98-0417-CR 5 novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13626 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael M. Longcore
review de novo.[4] State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App. 1987). The goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2553 - 2005-03-31
review de novo.[4] State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App. 1987). The goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts to the constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131635 - 2017-09-21
. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts to the constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131635 - 2017-09-21
Francesca Poulin v. Indian Community School
, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 221 Wis. 2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15211 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 221 Wis. 2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15211 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 76
an issue of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Otterstatter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
an issue of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Otterstatter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
Robert Garel v. Kenneth Morgan
interpretation is one that we review de novo. See Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C., 217 Wis. 2d 493, 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15672 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is one that we review de novo. See Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C., 217 Wis. 2d 493, 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15672 - 2005-03-31