Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 29821 for des.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 29821 for des.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maureen B. Fitzgerald
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25393 - 2006-06-01
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25393 - 2006-06-01
[PDF]
State v. Larry G. Edwards
not raise a "new issue" presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
not raise a "new issue" presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ronald J. Taylor v. West American Insurance Company
coverage. West American now appeals. II. ANALYSIS. ¶5 We review de novo the trial court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14780 - 2017-09-21
coverage. West American now appeals. II. ANALYSIS. ¶5 We review de novo the trial court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michelle S.
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19
State v. Arturo Melendez
, the question, as here, is one of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
, the question, as here, is one of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Bear Realty. This appeal followed. ¶9 “We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100616 - 2017-09-21
and Bear Realty. This appeal followed. ¶9 “We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100616 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
State v. Jeffrey L. Leggions
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alan W. Gursky
, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683 (1996), and its conclusions of law are subject to de novo review, id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13214 - 2017-09-21
, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683 (1996), and its conclusions of law are subject to de novo review, id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13214 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael E. Learmont
this court reviews de novo. See Littrup, 164 Wis.2d at 126, 473 N.W.2d at 166. Learmont's due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14673 - 2017-09-21
this court reviews de novo. See Littrup, 164 Wis.2d at 126, 473 N.W.2d at 166. Learmont's due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14673 - 2017-09-21