Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 15211 - 15220 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement and twenty-four months’ extended supervision for the marijuana charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113853 - 2017-09-21
’ initial confinement and twenty-four months’ extended supervision for the marijuana charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
years of initial confinement and thirteen years of extended supervision. Osinski filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
years of initial confinement and thirteen years of extended supervision. Osinski filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an aggregate sentence of 203 years of initial confinement and 62 years of extended supervision. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675234 - 2023-07-05
an aggregate sentence of 203 years of initial confinement and 62 years of extended supervision. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675234 - 2023-07-05
Christine A. Rotheray v. Timothy D. Wilson
efforts in renovating the house during the extended pendency of the divorce. The court then adjusted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17934 - 2005-04-27
efforts in renovating the house during the extended pendency of the divorce. The court then adjusted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17934 - 2005-04-27
The Shelby Insurance Company v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
that Shelby, the homeowner’s insurer, did not contemplate extending coverage under its homeowner’s policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15181 - 2005-03-31
that Shelby, the homeowner’s insurer, did not contemplate extending coverage under its homeowner’s policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15181 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months of initial confinement and twelve months of extended supervision. The court also ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134690 - 2017-09-21
months of initial confinement and twelve months of extended supervision. The court also ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134690 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Cynthia A. Provo
charge, with two and a half years in prison and the remainder on extended supervision. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5600 - 2017-09-19
charge, with two and a half years in prison and the remainder on extended supervision. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert L. Taylor
a showing of good cause, the supreme court may extend the time for filing a recommendation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26346 - 2017-09-21
a showing of good cause, the supreme court may extend the time for filing a recommendation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
results. It must extend not only to those consequences which are desired, but also to those which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26607 - 2014-09-15
results. It must extend not only to those consequences which are desired, but also to those which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision. Although the no-merit report does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218917 - 2018-09-11
confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision. Although the no-merit report does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218917 - 2018-09-11

