Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15221 - 15230 of 29828 for des.
Search results 15221 - 15230 of 29828 for des.
Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11453 - 2005-03-31
questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11453 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶48. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
as a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶48. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant received constitutionally ineffective assistance de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶24, 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862617 - 2024-10-16
the defendant received constitutionally ineffective assistance de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶24, 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862617 - 2024-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal standards necessary to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
. 1996). We review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal standards necessary to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65, ¶24, 326 Wis. 2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142503 - 2015-05-27
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65, ¶24, 326 Wis. 2d 268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142503 - 2015-05-27
State v. Randy J. G.
. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9607 - 2005-03-31
. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123252 - 2017-09-21
. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123252 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether the facts supported probable cause, which we review de novo. See id. Discussion ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2008-10-01
of whether the facts supported probable cause, which we review de novo. See id. Discussion ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2008-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269568 - 2020-07-15
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269568 - 2020-07-15
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6218 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6218 - 2005-03-31