Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15221 - 15230 of 20860 for word.
Search results 15221 - 15230 of 20860 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
admissible.” In other words, the portions of the Miranda warning that Harris is most concerned about are his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33867 - 2008-08-27
admissible.” In other words, the portions of the Miranda warning that Harris is most concerned about are his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33867 - 2008-08-27
State v. Kinte Scott
by the suspicious circumstances. In the words of Adams, Stevens was not required “to simply shrug his shoulders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16271 - 2005-03-31
by the suspicious circumstances. In the words of Adams, Stevens was not required “to simply shrug his shoulders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16271 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luegene Antoine Hampton
of a criminal proceeding if the error had no effect on the judgment.” Id. at 691. In other words, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4608 - 2005-03-31
of a criminal proceeding if the error had no effect on the judgment.” Id. at 691. In other words, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in Clause (a) exist.” No. 2010AP1758 8 ¶16 In other words, even if one or both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70216 - 2014-09-15
in Clause (a) exist.” No. 2010AP1758 8 ¶16 In other words, even if one or both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70216 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
but an accumulation of items” that determined the reasonability of Officer Tisher’s actions. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13
but an accumulation of items” that determined the reasonability of Officer Tisher’s actions. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13
Bridget C. v. Stephen J.C.
counsel’s unsubstantiated assertions. It is, in essence—and in the words of the brief—no more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14843 - 2005-03-31
counsel’s unsubstantiated assertions. It is, in essence—and in the words of the brief—no more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14843 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Johnson
not diminish or extenuate its inherently prejudicial nature. Similarly, that Johnson's words also had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16160 - 2005-03-31
not diminish or extenuate its inherently prejudicial nature. Similarly, that Johnson's words also had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16160 - 2005-03-31
The Estate of Robert Murray v. The Travelers Insurance Company
be applied, an employee must have a “given place of employment.” We conclude the words “given place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
be applied, an employee must have a “given place of employment.” We conclude the words “given place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 117
completion of the terms of the agreement; in other words, this provision specifies the benefit Kaczmarski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37389 - 2009-08-25
completion of the terms of the agreement; in other words, this provision specifies the benefit Kaczmarski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37389 - 2009-08-25
Wisconsin Professional Police Association v. Oneida County
was awarding a pay provision that clearly differed from the plain wording of the County’s certified final offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2266 - 2005-03-31
was awarding a pay provision that clearly differed from the plain wording of the County’s certified final offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2266 - 2005-03-31