Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15231 - 15240 of 83457 for case code.
Search results 15231 - 15240 of 83457 for case code.
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly M. Desimone
. Desimone abandoned a cigarette case when, during a thunderstorm, she placed it in a mailbox not belonging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19730 - 2017-09-21
. Desimone abandoned a cigarette case when, during a thunderstorm, she placed it in a mailbox not belonging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19730 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment dismissing this personal injury case filed by John Reget. We conclude that the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605745 - 2022-12-30
for summary judgment dismissing this personal injury case filed by John Reget. We conclude that the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605745 - 2022-12-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609028 - 2023-01-10
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609028 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
Steven J. Wickenhauser v. Jack Lehtinen
. Lehtinen argues that because the Wickenhausers obtained rescission in a previous case, they are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20888 - 2017-09-21
. Lehtinen argues that because the Wickenhausers obtained rescission in a previous case, they are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20888 - 2017-09-21
Steven J. Wickenhauser v. Jack Lehtinen
preclusion. Lehtinen argues that because the Wickenhausers obtained rescission in a previous case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
preclusion. Lehtinen argues that because the Wickenhausers obtained rescission in a previous case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
State v. Steven P. Berth
prior convictions in cases 97-CM-433, 96-CM-1696,[1] 94-CM-1119 and 91-CM-714, in which Berth had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13843 - 2005-03-31
prior convictions in cases 97-CM-433, 96-CM-1696,[1] 94-CM-1119 and 91-CM-714, in which Berth had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are Nos. 2019AP2368 2019AP2369 2019AP2370
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309107 - 2020-12-01
and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are Nos. 2019AP2368 2019AP2369 2019AP2370
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309107 - 2020-12-01
[PDF]
State v. Steven P. Berth
prior convictions in cases 97-CM-433, 96- CM-1696,1 94-CM-1119 and 91-CM-714, in which Berth had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13843 - 2014-09-15
prior convictions in cases 97-CM-433, 96- CM-1696,1 94-CM-1119 and 91-CM-714, in which Berth had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107870 - 2026-04-23
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107870 - 2026-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2019AP2080-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367834 - 2021-05-19
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2019AP2080-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367834 - 2021-05-19