Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15241 - 15250 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15241 - 15250 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael M. Longcore
this court undertakes de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311, 313 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14556 - 2005-03-31
this court undertakes de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311, 313 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14556 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
a motion was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
De Peters Electronic Notice You are hereby notified that the Court has entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
De Peters Electronic Notice You are hereby notified that the Court has entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
State v. George L. Jones
proceedings, we review the postconviction court’s findings of fact de novo. State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
proceedings, we review the postconviction court’s findings of fact de novo. State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6218 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6218 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andrew S. Miller
facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
determinations unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts are sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32259 - 2014-09-15
determinations unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts are sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32259 - 2014-09-15