Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15241 - 15250 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15241 - 15250 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
State v. Robert W. Sweat
] Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
] Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Leggions
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradley D. Muck
to an undisputed set of facts, like any statutory construction, is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6262 - 2017-09-19
to an undisputed set of facts, like any statutory construction, is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6262 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question that we review de novo. Harvot v. Solo Cup Co., 2009 WI 85, ¶¶31-32, 320 Wis.2d 1, 768
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82292 - 2014-09-15
is a legal question that we review de novo. Harvot v. Solo Cup Co., 2009 WI 85, ¶¶31-32, 320 Wis.2d 1, 768
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82292 - 2014-09-15
State v. Karleen K. Raasch
review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp., 216 Wis.2d 49, 52-53, 573 N.W.2d 572, 574 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13679 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp., 216 Wis.2d 49, 52-53, 573 N.W.2d 572, 574 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13679 - 2005-03-31
Kris J. Kavelaris v. MSI Insurance Company
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Aurora Med. Group v. DWD, 2000 WI 70, ¶11, 236 Wis. 2d 1, 612
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3224 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Aurora Med. Group v. DWD, 2000 WI 70, ¶11, 236 Wis. 2d 1, 612
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3224 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the verdict satisfies the legal elements of the crime constitutes a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118464 - 2014-07-28
to the verdict satisfies the legal elements of the crime constitutes a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118464 - 2014-07-28
State Bank of Cross Plains v. Douglas J. Garavalia
a question of law, which we review de novo. Garcia v. Mazda Motors of Am. Inc., 2004 WI 93,¶7, 273 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25276 - 2006-05-24
a question of law, which we review de novo. Garcia v. Mazda Motors of Am. Inc., 2004 WI 93,¶7, 273 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25276 - 2006-05-24
[PDF]
State v. Kirk W. Holstein
, is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal, Holstein posits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4957 - 2017-09-19
, is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal, Holstein posits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4957 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02