Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15241 - 15250 of 29996 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
.2d 733, 737 (1968). We review questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14702 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concerns a question of law, such as the interpretation of an insurance policy, appellate review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987239 - 2025-07-23

[PDF] Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
is also de novo, and we apply the same standards and methods as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4886 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo. Kimbrough, 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192221 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555584 - 2022-08-16

[PDF] State v. Dustin W. B.
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5191 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Vito George Ambrosia
as applied to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19

State v. James Jagodinsky
York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31

State v. Audell Hernandez
that this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶7 Hernandez contends that his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15395 - 2005-03-31