Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15241 - 15250 of 82994 for simple case search.

State v. Vincent D. Whitaker
officer to search the impounded vehicle for any registration papers. A crumpled registration slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9918 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
to the United States Constitution … protect[s] citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38160 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
as protective measure for the safety of the officers, and that as soon as they completed searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61400 - 2014-09-15

Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
, Cornelius was present when the circuit court instructed the jury that the case was a fact-finding proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6379 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
rights under WIS. STAT. ch. 2271 and the right to request a contested case hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48497 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Larry E. Thomas
cases.” Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶¶8, 76. In any event, the Gallion court did “not make any momentous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7117 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71242 - 2011-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a no-contest plea to the amphetamine charge in this case in exchange for the dismissal of four other drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262706 - 2020-06-02

Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
, Cornelius was present when the circuit court instructed the jury that the case was a fact-finding proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6378 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. In the absence of citation to the record, we search for reasons to sustain a discretionary decision. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206653 - 2018-01-10