Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15251 - 15260 of 49819 for our.

State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
Not to unduly lengthen this opinion, but our recent comments on the effectiveness of the PBT in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28

COURT OF APPEALS
Coll., 2004 WI App 100, ¶10, 273 Wis. 2d 471, 478, 681 N.W.2d 302, 305. ¶8 Our analysis need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34814 - 2008-12-08

John J. Mitten v. The Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
appeal. Accordingly, our decision will address only his certiorari appeal. Therefore, our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14131 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to Miller’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208873 - 2018-02-23

[PDF] State v. Matthew S. Olsen
that the Minnesota court did not follow Wisconsin’s colloquy requirements, as outlined by our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Sec. 102.23(6). Our role involves the narrow task of searching the record for evidence that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30104 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we Nos. 2022AP314-CR 2022AP315-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848154 - 2024-09-11

State v. Norgie Vieras
that the children had exhibited any trauma since the incidents. Our conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9528 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
way reflects an erroneous exercise of the court’s sentencing discretion. As our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245881 - 2019-09-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174942 - 2017-09-21