Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15261 - 15270 of 60458 for two's.

State v. Antwan B. Manuel
The police arrested Stamps two days later at his girlfriend’s apartment. At the time of Stamps’ arrest, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6057 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). In this case, the State concedes that the delay of two years and three months between Schmidt-Sharkey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216057 - 2018-07-24

State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
differences between the two statements. ¶5 Because the facts alleged in the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25

COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred in two respects. First, the State argues that Xiong was not “in custody” during his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35419 - 2009-04-20

State v. Antoine D. Edwards
south on Third Street. She further testified that, around that time, she also saw a man with two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 20-07 supporting memo
, language, and procedure. There are no major differences between the two systems with respect to how
/supreme/docs/2007memo.pdf - 2020-11-11

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2009
. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Behrendt asks the Supreme Court to review two questions: - Does Silvan owe
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35721 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2016
, as a repeater. In addition to the two counts to which he pled guilty, Loomis was originally also charged
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164653 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses
. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Behrendt asks the Supreme Court to review two questions: - Does Silvan owe
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35719 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
contends, for two reasons: it was not conducted pursuant to a law enforcement vehicle seizure policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175371 - 2017-09-21