Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15271 - 15280 of 43041 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Set Sudimoro Pacitan.

State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
set, only applicable at the end of the 6 months jail on the felony conviction. … Ct. 2.: Consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-12-14

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
postconviction motions in the circuit court. The facts surrounding Wolfe’s homicide conviction have been set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097254 - 2026-04-01

[PDF] Thomas G. Kruk v. Judith L. Kruk
to be relevant. No. 00-1771 5 trial court utilized the factors set forth in § 767.24(5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2758 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert Plevin v. Department of Transportation
acceptable examples; or, as a statement of limitation setting forth an exclusive list. See Milwaukee Gas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5959 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Stephen M. Wolfe
intending to burglarize it. The complaint also sets forth Wolfe's admission that he and Borzych
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7886 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Andrew S. Miller
, “No.” The court set a date of November 26-28, 2001, to which defense counsel agreed. That trial was delayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Outagamie County v. Martin J. McGlone
considers whether claim preclusion applies to an undisputed set of facts. See Amber J.F. v. Richard B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15556 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald L. Tappa
because (1) the trial court placed No. 02-0247-CR 2 excessive emphasis on the rural setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4883 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Kluck
.... Id. at 474, 230 N.W.2d at 669. A "new factor" is: [A] fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9520 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Andre Derrick Wingo
to the procedures set forth in § 972.02(1), the proper remedy is reversal of the conviction and a new trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17460 - 2017-09-21