Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15271 - 15280 of 59394 for quit claim deed.
Search results 15271 - 15280 of 59394 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct broader than the claimed harassment. We affirm on the grounds that Bush-Pensy has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246923 - 2019-09-17
conduct broader than the claimed harassment. We affirm on the grounds that Bush-Pensy has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246923 - 2019-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
by Gerard. Gerard claims: (1) the trial court should not have granted the protective order; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26615 - 2014-09-15
by Gerard. Gerard claims: (1) the trial court should not have granted the protective order; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ responses do not present issues with arguable merit. We normally decline to address claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355584 - 2021-04-14
’ responses do not present issues with arguable merit. We normally decline to address claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355584 - 2021-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Jimmy J.’s only claim of error on this appeal is that the trial court should not have instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118898 - 2014-09-15
Jimmy J.’s only claim of error on this appeal is that the trial court should not have instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118898 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing his tort claim for malicious prosecution against his now-ex-wife, Antoinette Schaffrath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155571 - 2017-09-21
dismissing his tort claim for malicious prosecution against his now-ex-wife, Antoinette Schaffrath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155571 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
dissented: Donna D. and Lynn G.[2] I. ¶3 Jimmy J.’s only claim of error on this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118898 - 2014-08-04
dissented: Donna D. and Lynn G.[2] I. ¶3 Jimmy J.’s only claim of error on this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118898 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment; and (3) Hiser was not required to support his claim with expert testimony. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169483 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment; and (3) Hiser was not required to support his claim with expert testimony. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169483 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 7, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
an arguably meritorious claim on appeal. ¶5 The trial court found Reimer was indigent and directed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65333 - 2012-03-27
an arguably meritorious claim on appeal. ¶5 The trial court found Reimer was indigent and directed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65333 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Sherman B. Rones
motions. He claims that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2988 - 2017-09-19
motions. He claims that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2988 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jerjuan Spiller
), all as party to a crime. Spiller claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it summarily denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3188 - 2005-03-31
), all as party to a crime. Spiller claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it summarily denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3188 - 2005-03-31