Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15281 - 15290 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 15281 - 15290 of 98406 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretionary decision, this court may affirm the decision if it is supported by facts in the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188711 - 2017-09-21
discretionary decision, this court may affirm the decision if it is supported by facts in the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188711 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or sentence modification “because there is no indication in the record that the [sentencing] court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
or sentence modification “because there is no indication in the record that the [sentencing] court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137010 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not distinguish either man from the recordings. Although the circuit court commented that Godley’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210850 - 2018-04-10
not distinguish either man from the recordings. Although the circuit court commented that Godley’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210850 - 2018-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. Given the record on appeal, the court’s findings of fact in this case are not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152691 - 2017-09-21
. Id. Given the record on appeal, the court’s findings of fact in this case are not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152691 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
packet is also not part of the record. No. 2015AP2176-CR 6 ¶9 The circuit court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
packet is also not part of the record. No. 2015AP2176-CR 6 ¶9 The circuit court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Gabriella concede Lins “is correct that, on the record, the court only called [Summerhill’s case].”6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
and Gabriella concede Lins “is correct that, on the record, the court only called [Summerhill’s case].”6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
justification for the decision present in the record.” Id., ¶35. ¶10 Here, the circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209092 - 2018-03-01
justification for the decision present in the record.” Id., ¶35. ¶10 Here, the circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209092 - 2018-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, based on the evidence in the record and without considering K.A.B.’s out-of-court, testimonial hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
, based on the evidence in the record and without considering K.A.B.’s out-of-court, testimonial hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agree with Paul that the record does not support the circuit court’s oral finding that Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724651 - 2023-11-07
agree with Paul that the record does not support the circuit court’s oral finding that Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724651 - 2023-11-07