Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15281 - 15290 of 30164 for de.
Search results 15281 - 15290 of 30164 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 592. Then, we review de novo how those facts apply to a constitutional standard. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59276 - 2011-01-25
N.W.2d 592. Then, we review de novo how those facts apply to a constitutional standard. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59276 - 2011-01-25
[PDF]
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8782 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8782 - 2017-09-19
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
de novo. See State v. Echols, 152 Wis.2d 725, 739, 449 N.W.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Echols, 152 Wis.2d 725, 739, 449 N.W.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
defense is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Jensen, 2007 WI App 256
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35451 - 2009-02-04
defense is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Jensen, 2007 WI App 256
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35451 - 2009-02-04
Rodney Rowsey v. Kenneth Morgan
we review de novo. Id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ernie Garibay v. Circuit Court for Kenosha County
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
State v. Robert C. Knight
de novo. See id. at 973, 468 N.W.2d at 701. ¶11 Whether Knight had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15116 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See id. at 973, 468 N.W.2d at 701. ¶11 Whether Knight had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15116 - 2005-03-31
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31