Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 95467 for Shawano County Case Search.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 95467 for Shawano County Case Search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL J. DWYER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375668 - 2021-06-15
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL J. DWYER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375668 - 2021-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-APPELLANT. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOSEPH R. WALL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862046 - 2024-10-15
-APPELLANT. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOSEPH R. WALL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862046 - 2024-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
regulation cases in which the penalty is a civil forfeiture. County of Racine, 122 Wis. 2d at 436. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
regulation cases in which the penalty is a civil forfeiture. County of Racine, 122 Wis. 2d at 436. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
regulation cases in which the penalty is a civil forfeiture. County of Racine, 122 Wis. 2d at 436. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62279 - 2014-09-15
regulation cases in which the penalty is a civil forfeiture. County of Racine, 122 Wis. 2d at 436. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62279 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Amended rules petition 06-08
filing pilot project involving a single case type, two counties, two volunteer law firms, and existing
/supreme/docs/0608petitionamend.pdf - 2010-01-20
filing pilot project involving a single case type, two counties, two volunteer law firms, and existing
/supreme/docs/0608petitionamend.pdf - 2010-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208214 - 2018-02-14
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208214 - 2018-02-14
Rule Order
Rules are amended to read: SCR 72.01 (1) Civil case files. All papers deposited with the clerk
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48648 - 2010-03-31
Rules are amended to read: SCR 72.01 (1) Civil case files. All papers deposited with the clerk
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48648 - 2010-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for St. Croix County: SCOTT R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235025 - 2019-02-20
, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for St. Croix County: SCOTT R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235025 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The parties agree that the County’s burden of proof in this civil case is clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736829 - 2023-12-07
The parties agree that the County’s burden of proof in this civil case is clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736829 - 2023-12-07