Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this No. 2017AP1259-CR 5 court decides de novo. See id., ¶33. Whether a new factor warrants sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
that this No. 2017AP1259-CR 5 court decides de novo. See id., ¶33. Whether a new factor warrants sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
¶5 Whether the right to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
¶5 Whether the right to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo.” Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797950 - 2024-05-08
was deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo.” Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797950 - 2024-05-08
State v. Trevor A. McKee
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference, or we may review de novo, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115918 - 2014-06-30
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference, or we may review de novo, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115918 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
CA Blank Order
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87717 - 2014-09-15
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21