Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 30059 for de.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Gary A. Michels
, such as Michels’, presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 302. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4672 - 2017-09-19
, such as Michels’, presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 302. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4672 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
State v. Andrew S. Miller
facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
State v. John T. Werner
to an undisputed set of facts, like any statutory construction, is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3297 - 2005-03-31
to an undisputed set of facts, like any statutory construction, is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3297 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 75
is a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36204 - 2009-05-26
is a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36204 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14702 - 2017-09-21
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14702 - 2017-09-21
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Trevor A. McKee
were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11975 - 2017-09-21
were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11975 - 2017-09-21