Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 30164 for de.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 30164 for de.
[PDF]
Ernie Garibay v. Circuit Court for Kenosha County
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6209 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6209 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
State v. Robert C. Knight
de novo. See id. at 973, 468 N.W.2d at 701. ¶11 Whether Knight had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15116 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See id. at 973, 468 N.W.2d at 701. ¶11 Whether Knight had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15116 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
State v. David W. Janke
and constitutional standards are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
and constitutional standards are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Louise Sterlinske v. School District of Bruce
(2), STATS. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11413 - 2017-09-19
(2), STATS. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11413 - 2017-09-19