Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 29796 for des.
Search results 15291 - 15300 of 29796 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
[PDF]
WI 12
, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id. Finally, we determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92089 - 2014-09-15
, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id. Finally, we determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92089 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
Construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21
Construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Boyd directly committed the robbery when it stated that he “came back into the store” was a de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22
that Boyd directly committed the robbery when it stated that he “came back into the store” was a de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
[PDF]
WI APP 91
review both questions de novo. See State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15
review both questions de novo. See State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Keizer
a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
probable cause under a de novo standard of review. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
probable cause under a de novo standard of review. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
State v. William E. Conley
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12922 - 2005-03-31
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12922 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31