Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1531 - 1540 of 17369 for Cost.
Search results 1531 - 1540 of 17369 for Cost.
Russell A. Sleight v. Vicki L. Sleight
attorney fees and costs to Russell’s brother, Michael Sleight, resulting from her third-party claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6848 - 2005-03-31
attorney fees and costs to Russell’s brother, Michael Sleight, resulting from her third-party claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. David A. Day appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce the fine and costs reflected on his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138452 - 2017-09-21
. David A. Day appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce the fine and costs reflected on his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138452 - 2017-09-21
Julie A. Jakubowski v. Rock Valley Builders, Inc.
plus costs of $654.85, under § 100.20(5), Stats.[2] It then reduced that sum by $6,532.24, the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13776 - 2005-03-31
plus costs of $654.85, under § 100.20(5), Stats.[2] It then reduced that sum by $6,532.24, the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13776 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
between the thefts by Nellen and the cost to replace the victims’ locks for a third time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211054 - 2018-04-12
between the thefts by Nellen and the cost to replace the victims’ locks for a third time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211054 - 2018-04-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on May 9, 2000, describes the cost-sharing for the twenty-four-foot driveway access for all three lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
on May 9, 2000, describes the cost-sharing for the twenty-four-foot driveway access for all three lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
CA Blank Order
. David A. Day appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce the fine and costs reflected on his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138452 - 2015-02-24
. David A. Day appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce the fine and costs reflected on his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138452 - 2015-02-24
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12399 - 2005-03-31
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12399 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Walker then determined the value of the property’s improvements. To do so, he calculated the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93008 - 2013-02-18
Walker then determined the value of the property’s improvements. To do so, he calculated the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93008 - 2013-02-18
[PDF]
Rene Faye Zastrow v. Neal Alan Zastrow
. NEAL ALAN ZASTROW, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. NO. 04-0347-FT IN THE MATTER OF COSTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7292 - 2017-09-20
. NEAL ALAN ZASTROW, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. NO. 04-0347-FT IN THE MATTER OF COSTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7292 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Keith K. Kost v. Neal Alan Zastrow
. NEAL ALAN ZASTROW, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. NO. 04-0347-FT IN THE MATTER OF COSTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7293 - 2017-09-20
. NEAL ALAN ZASTROW, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. NO. 04-0347-FT IN THE MATTER OF COSTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7293 - 2017-09-20