Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1531 - 1540 of 83284 for case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s denial of her suppression motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Kostuck-Hass contends that the search warrant leading to the discovery of contraband in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135364 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude this case is controlled by State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶¶20-22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] However, these cases do not address the issue of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22

[PDF] State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
have to have a search warrant on cases like this.” He then testified that he said “I am not going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19

State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
responded, “We don't have to have a search warrant on cases like this.” He then testified that he said “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8917 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
to a focused protective search. Id., ¶15. Although there are some similarities between Mohr and this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33410 - 2008-07-14

[PDF] WI 94
the initial stop to the search. Id. The court emphasized that "under the facts of this case, the trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33410 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
2008 WI 84 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP974-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33358 - 2008-07-08

[PDF] WI 84
2008 WI 84 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP974-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33358 - 2014-09-15