Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1531 - 1540 of 2437 for nys.
Search results 1531 - 1540 of 2437 for nys.
[PDF]
State v. Walter Junior Hamilton
. § 893.87, the ten-year time limit governing “[a]ny action in favor of the state,” applies. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3841 - 2017-09-20
. § 893.87, the ten-year time limit governing “[a]ny action in favor of the state,” applies. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3841 - 2017-09-20
Holly Lynn Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
to ... [a]ny record containing personally identifiable information that, if disclosed, would ... [e]ndanger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7762 - 2005-03-31
to ... [a]ny record containing personally identifiable information that, if disclosed, would ... [e]ndanger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7762 - 2005-03-31
Town of Lyndon v. Robert A. Oines
No. 3 provides that “[a]ny structure or building hereafter erected, placed upon, moved upon or enlarged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5730 - 2005-03-31
No. 3 provides that “[a]ny structure or building hereafter erected, placed upon, moved upon or enlarged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5730 - 2005-03-31
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. Gerald Berge
[1] including “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” § 806.07(1)(a), and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13844 - 2005-03-31
[1] including “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” § 806.07(1)(a), and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13844 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. Gerald Berge
or excusable neglect,” § 806.07(1)(a), and “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13844 - 2014-09-15
or excusable neglect,” § 806.07(1)(a), and “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13844 - 2014-09-15
John C. Stelpflug v. Town Board
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 80.17. Section 80.17 provides that "[a]ny person aggrieved by any order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17315 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 80.17. Section 80.17 provides that "[a]ny person aggrieved by any order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17315 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶14 “[A]ny claim that could have been raised on direct appeal” or in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158871 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶14 “[A]ny claim that could have been raised on direct appeal” or in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that “[a]ny person who is arrested shall be taken within a reasonable time before a judge,” see id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295193 - 2020-10-13
that “[a]ny person who is arrested shall be taken within a reasonable time before a judge,” see id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295193 - 2020-10-13
Stan's Lumber, Inc. v. Gary P. Fleming
“[a]ny activity to which the parties might have been bound was in the future and remained to be done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7876 - 2005-03-31
“[a]ny activity to which the parties might have been bound was in the future and remained to be done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7876 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, surprise, or excusable neglect[,]” or § 806.07(1)(h), a catch-all provision allowing relief for “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144101 - 2015-07-06
, surprise, or excusable neglect[,]” or § 806.07(1)(h), a catch-all provision allowing relief for “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144101 - 2015-07-06