Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1531 - 1540 of 63537 for records.
Search results 1531 - 1540 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by failing to provide specific reasons on the record for keeping him in restraints and guarded at the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73203 - 2014-09-15
by failing to provide specific reasons on the record for keeping him in restraints and guarded at the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73203 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 127
denying her motion pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.015 (2011-12) 1 to expunge the record related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129267 - 2017-09-21
denying her motion pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.015 (2011-12) 1 to expunge the record related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129267 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles W. Randle
the totality of the record, we conclude that Randle’s plea, in conjunction with a plea agreement incorporating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
the totality of the record, we conclude that Randle’s plea, in conjunction with a plea agreement incorporating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 13-08 - Comments from the Wisconsin State Bar
that, in this case, the clerk’s incomplete stamping was ‘beyond the control’ of the State. To repeat, the record
/supreme/docs/1308commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-12-02
that, in this case, the clerk’s incomplete stamping was ‘beyond the control’ of the State. To repeat, the record
/supreme/docs/1308commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-12-02
Wi App 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP6 Complete Title of...
. § 973.015 (2011-12)[1] to expunge the record related to a Kenosha County ordinance violation for which she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129267 - 2014-12-18
. § 973.015 (2011-12)[1] to expunge the record related to a Kenosha County ordinance violation for which she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129267 - 2014-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred by failing to provide specific reasons on the record for keeping him in restraints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
that the circuit court erred by failing to provide specific reasons on the record for keeping him in restraints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Slocum’s motions to “correct the record,” and whether the court properly dismissed Slocum’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162724 - 2017-09-21
of Slocum’s motions to “correct the record,” and whether the court properly dismissed Slocum’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Randle
. We affirm the conviction because, under the totality of the record, we conclude that Randle’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
. We affirm the conviction because, under the totality of the record, we conclude that Randle’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dennis Van Straten v. David H. Schwarz
the order. The scope of certiorari review is limited to the record and includes the agency's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12397 - 2017-09-21
the order. The scope of certiorari review is limited to the record and includes the agency's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21