Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15301 - 15310 of 20937 for word.

Tommy Ponchik v. Jody Bradley
, and hearings are not published. So I am limited to the words of the statute. ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7019 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter, scope, history, and the object which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane County
.” In other words, this aggregate cost assessment is indivisible by the number of days a patient stays
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5806 - 2017-09-19

State v. Lana Lanser
volume. Q So, in other words, would the alcohol sample ... be inaccurate if that swab was misused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
but an accumulation of items” that determined the reasonability of Officer Tisher’s actions. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13

State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
that the district attorney’s office was mandated to charge Banks as a second offender under the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15123 - 2005-03-31

State v. Harris D. Byers
distributively, so that each word is applied to the subject or consequent that most properly relates and applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2273 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
. In other words, had the same [hunters] spent the entire day hunting on the Monches property, they would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36717 - 2009-07-28

Peter Finn v. Nachreiner Boie Art Factory
of the word, ‘relate,’ but the policy of the statute requires preemption.”); see also Gibson v. Prudential Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9316 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patz Sales, Inc. v. Graetz Manufacturing, Inc.
with the words “that violates a person’s right of privacy.” No. 03-3477 11 all connected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7181 - 2017-09-20