Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15311 - 15320 of 30165 for de.
Search results 15311 - 15320 of 30165 for de.
2009 WI APP 75
is a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36204 - 2009-05-26
is a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36204 - 2009-05-26
Bruce Mieloch v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s decision on a motion to dismiss de novo. See Northbrook Wis., LLC v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-17
review a circuit court’s decision on a motion to dismiss de novo. See Northbrook Wis., LLC v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
Ronald J. Taylor v. West American Insurance Company
de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14780 - 2005-03-31
de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14780 - 2005-03-31
Richard F. Salewske v. Leroy W. Depies
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Dane County, 142 Wis. 2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16261 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Dane County, 142 Wis. 2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16261 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31