Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 30254 for de.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 30254 for de.
Russell A. Jorgensen v. Dean G. Katz
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110257 - 2026-04-29
assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110257 - 2026-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07
findings of historical fact will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
[PDF]
Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8183 - 2017-09-19
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael L., Jr.
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5302 - 2017-09-19
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5302 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177635 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sisk
an investigative stop presents a No. 00-2614-CR 4 question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3075 - 2017-09-19
an investigative stop presents a No. 00-2614-CR 4 question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3075 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Marty H. Coopman v. American Family Insurance Company
contracts and the interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12264 - 2017-09-21
contracts and the interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12264 - 2017-09-21