Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 29817 for des.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 29817 for des.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6200 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6200 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6203 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6203 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
reviews de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329, 332 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329, 332 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law for our de novo review. Id. ¶6 Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 939.66(2), an included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97974 - 2013-06-10
a question of law for our de novo review. Id. ¶6 Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 939.66(2), an included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97974 - 2013-06-10
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investment, Inc.
of law subject to our de novo review. See Hobl v. Lord, 162 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 470 N.W.2d 265 (1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6160 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to our de novo review. See Hobl v. Lord, 162 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 470 N.W.2d 265 (1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6160 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
State v. City of Rhinelander
the grant or denial of a No. 02-2322-FT 4 summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5611 - 2017-09-19
the grant or denial of a No. 02-2322-FT 4 summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5611 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Garel v. Kenneth Morgan
of statutory interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation is one that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15672 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation is one that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15672 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jesse Ruiz
review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 309-10. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 309-10. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
Outagamie County v. Karen C.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4556 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4556 - 2005-03-31