Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 68207 for law.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 68207 for law.
State v. Miyosha K. White
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Len Kachinsky of Sisson & Kachinsky Law Offices, Appleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Len Kachinsky of Sisson & Kachinsky Law Offices, Appleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Colleen M. Thomas
of the traffic stop to the local police department for purposes of field sobriety tests converted a lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15727 - 2017-09-21
of the traffic stop to the local police department for purposes of field sobriety tests converted a lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15727 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reported a hit-and-run accident to the police, and law enforcement investigated the incident by reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
reported a hit-and-run accident to the police, and law enforcement investigated the incident by reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
State v. Colleen M. Thomas
tests converted a lawful Terry[1] detention into an illegal custodial arrest. We reject Thomas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
tests converted a lawful Terry[1] detention into an illegal custodial arrest. We reject Thomas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lamontae D. M.
is a question of first impression. [2] This question requires us to apply the law governing the status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14148 - 2005-03-31
is a question of first impression. [2] This question requires us to apply the law governing the status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contrary to law. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 There is no genuine dispute regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800524 - 2024-05-15
contrary to law. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 There is no genuine dispute regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800524 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by a ruling of law from another jurisdiction in a case in which the State was not a party, because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54341 - 2014-09-15
by a ruling of law from another jurisdiction in a case in which the State was not a party, because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54341 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient factual basis is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
a sufficient factual basis is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to the sale. The trial court correctly ruled, as a matter of law, that there could be no justifiable reliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38744 - 2009-08-03
to the sale. The trial court correctly ruled, as a matter of law, that there could be no justifiable reliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38744 - 2009-08-03
Robert J. Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Board of Appeals
; (2) whether it proceeded on a correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
; (2) whether it proceeded on a correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24