Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 50071 for our.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 50071 for our.
Carl Jensen v. City of Appleton
perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3255 - 2005-03-31
perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3255 - 2005-03-31
Ben Breister v. Valley Bakers Coop Assn.
N.W.2d 241 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Wis. Stat. § 102.23(6). Our role on appeal is to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6902 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 241 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Wis. Stat. § 102.23(6). Our role on appeal is to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to Guthrie-Bey’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133789 - 2017-09-21
to Guthrie-Bey’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133789 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the sentence credit calculated upon his 2009 probation revocation. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148201 - 2015-09-01
review of the sentence credit calculated upon his 2009 probation revocation. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148201 - 2015-09-01
State v. David Entis Rees
The parties disagree on the appellate standard of review. Rees argues that our review should be de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31
The parties disagree on the appellate standard of review. Rees argues that our review should be de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John J. Mitten v. The Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
, our decision will address only his certiorari appeal. Therefore, our review is limited to questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14131 - 2014-09-15
, our decision will address only his certiorari appeal. Therefore, our review is limited to questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14131 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111763 - 2014-05-01
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111763 - 2014-05-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
these decisions that our supreme court “concluded that the sentencing court had erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
these decisions that our supreme court “concluded that the sentencing court had erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court then follows up on the record. Id. Our supreme court has not retreated from its position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29632 - 2007-07-16
court then follows up on the record. Id. Our supreme court has not retreated from its position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29632 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
se, appeals from a December 12, 2023 order denying his motion for reconsideration. At issue is our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073006 - 2026-02-04
se, appeals from a December 12, 2023 order denying his motion for reconsideration. At issue is our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073006 - 2026-02-04