Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 20930 for word.
Search results 15331 - 15340 of 20930 for word.
[PDF]
WI App 49
180 days”—in other words, an owner engaging in short-term No. 2024AP994 10 rental must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980254 - 2025-09-18
180 days”—in other words, an owner engaging in short-term No. 2024AP994 10 rental must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980254 - 2025-09-18
Brittany Frost v. Doreen Whitbeck
. Co., 2001 WI 93, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 134, 628 N.W.2d 916. However, if words or phrases in a policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3579 - 2005-03-31
. Co., 2001 WI 93, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 134, 628 N.W.2d 916. However, if words or phrases in a policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3579 - 2005-03-31
Emmett O'Connell, Jr. v. Gerald L. O'Connell
interpret statutes, we seek to give effect to the plain meaning of their words because we “assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7434 - 2005-03-31
interpret statutes, we seek to give effect to the plain meaning of their words because we “assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that form on his behalf until the plea hearing. He testified that he did not know what the words “argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
that form on his behalf until the plea hearing. He testified that he did not know what the words “argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
that an individual is shirking, a circuit court is not obligated to specifically use the word “shirking.” Scheuer v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38609 - 2009-07-29
that an individual is shirking, a circuit court is not obligated to specifically use the word “shirking.” Scheuer v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38609 - 2009-07-29
John W. McDonough v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
, the Department asserts, the word “department” should be read into § 102.23 where “commission” is used. ¶15
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17337 - 2005-03-31
, the Department asserts, the word “department” should be read into § 102.23 where “commission” is used. ¶15
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17337 - 2005-03-31
Dunn County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
, subjugation of the sheriff to the clerk of courts. On that basis, we conclude the wording of the proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25024 - 2006-06-27
, subjugation of the sheriff to the clerk of courts. On that basis, we conclude the wording of the proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25024 - 2006-06-27
Wisconsin Professional Police Association v. Oneida County
was awarding a pay provision that clearly differed from the plain wording of the County’s certified final offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2266 - 2005-03-31
was awarding a pay provision that clearly differed from the plain wording of the County’s certified final offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2266 - 2005-03-31
Charles Collier v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
the parties’ arguments. This court could further dissect the record, parsing words and phrases along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5823 - 2005-03-31
the parties’ arguments. This court could further dissect the record, parsing words and phrases along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5823 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)). In other words, “[i]nconsistency exists when [a jury’s] answers cannot be reconciled, or cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81389 - 2014-09-15
)). In other words, “[i]nconsistency exists when [a jury’s] answers cannot be reconciled, or cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81389 - 2014-09-15