Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15351 - 15360 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15351 - 15360 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law, which we review de novo, although we accept the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
. This is a question of law, which we review de novo, although we accept the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law[,] which we review de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
is a question of law[,] which we review de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. This contention is based on the premise that the hearing officer’s interview of Sergeant Immel constituted a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30885 - 2007-11-14
. This contention is based on the premise that the hearing officer’s interview of Sergeant Immel constituted a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30885 - 2007-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo, giving weight to the circuit court’s decision because the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234404 - 2019-02-13
is a question of law that we review de novo, giving weight to the circuit court’s decision because the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234404 - 2019-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
State v. William M. Schleck
satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997177 - 2025-08-20
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997177 - 2025-08-20
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, based on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36285 - 2009-04-28
. Second, based on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36285 - 2009-04-28