Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15351 - 15360 of 34015 for dismissal.
Search results 15351 - 15360 of 34015 for dismissal.
COURT OF APPEALS
for OWI. Macho moved to dismiss the action and suppress evidence on the grounds that Edwards did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
for OWI. Macho moved to dismiss the action and suppress evidence on the grounds that Edwards did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
Frontsheet
provided that a number of other claims of misconduct against Attorney Omdahl would be dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46135 - 2010-03-18
provided that a number of other claims of misconduct against Attorney Omdahl would be dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46135 - 2010-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
order to vacate the TPR order and dismiss the TPR petition alleging the court lost competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17
order to vacate the TPR order and dismiss the TPR petition alleging the court lost competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32138 - 2008-03-17
Leonard L. Jones v. State
reason not apparent in the record, the drug charge was eventually dismissed,[3] and Jones “was defaulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
reason not apparent in the record, the drug charge was eventually dismissed,[3] and Jones “was defaulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Allen T. Ritchey
dismissed two and ordered forfeitures for the remaining four. Ritchey contends that the County of Walworth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20224 - 2005-11-15
dismissed two and ordered forfeitures for the remaining four. Ritchey contends that the County of Walworth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20224 - 2005-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment of delinquency and direct the trial court to enter an order dismissing the petition. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08
the judgment of delinquency and direct the trial court to enter an order dismissing the petition. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
without the owner’s consent and burglary, the remaining charges from this and another case were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89579 - 2012-11-26
without the owner’s consent and burglary, the remaining charges from this and another case were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89579 - 2012-11-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Accordingly, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss this no-merit appeal, and extend the time to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
. Accordingly, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss this no-merit appeal, and extend the time to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the reckless homicide charge was dismissed and read in. The court sentenced Osinski to a total of eleven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
and the reckless homicide charge was dismissed and read in. The court sentenced Osinski to a total of eleven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in exchange for the dismissal of the other counts as read-in offenses, dropping the sentence enhancers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357934 - 2021-04-20
, in exchange for the dismissal of the other counts as read-in offenses, dropping the sentence enhancers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357934 - 2021-04-20