Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15351 - 15360 of 77154 for j o e y ' s.
Search results 15351 - 15360 of 77154 for j o e y ' s.
Dale Marek v. David H. Schwarz
FINE, J. Dale Marek appeals an order affirming the revocation of his probation. Marek claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24978 - 2006-05-01
FINE, J. Dale Marek appeals an order affirming the revocation of his probation. Marek claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24978 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Richard John Vernon
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4066 - 2017-09-20
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4066 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Roosevelt Manuel
of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
State v. Roosevelt Manuel
of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general. There was oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11314 - 2005-03-31
of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general. There was oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11314 - 2005-03-31
Monroe Swan v. Douglas LaFollette
: On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15003 - 2005-04-11
: On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15003 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: Michael A. Schumacher JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: BRADLEY, A. W., J. and ABRAHAMSON
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170439 - 2017-09-21
: Michael A. Schumacher JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: BRADLEY, A. W., J. and ABRAHAMSON
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO C. H., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: R. J. M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175102 - 2017-09-21
OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO C. H., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: R. J. M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: JEAN A. DI MOTTO, Judge. Affirmed. ΒΆ1 FINE, J. On February 11, 2011, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: JEAN A. DI MOTTO, Judge. Affirmed. ΒΆ1 FINE, J. On February 11, 2011, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (Whitford et al.)
upon counsel for each of the parties via e-mail and U.S. Mail. Dated: October 25, 2021 /s/ Jakob
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motionamicuswhitford.pdf - 2021-10-25
upon counsel for each of the parties via e-mail and U.S. Mail. Dated: October 25, 2021 /s/ Jakob
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motionamicuswhitford.pdf - 2021-10-25
[PDF]
Manitowoc Western Company, Inc. v. Allan Montonen
-appellant-cross respondent-petitioner there were briefs by John J. Prentice, Andrew T. Phillips
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16355 - 2017-09-21
-appellant-cross respondent-petitioner there were briefs by John J. Prentice, Andrew T. Phillips
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16355 - 2017-09-21