Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15361 - 15370 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 15361 - 15370 of 63609 for records/1000.
State v. Kurt A. Flisram
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12343 - 2005-03-31
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP2214-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105864 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP2214-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2024AP378-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
. No. 2024AP378-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91469 - 2014-09-15
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91469 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the ambiguous state of the record as a whole. The record is silent as to who prepared that form, when, or what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30391 - 2007-09-26
the ambiguous state of the record as a whole. The record is silent as to who prepared that form, when, or what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30391 - 2007-09-26
John C. Koshick v. State
, as the date for Koshick to file his brief. The next event shown in the record is that on September 15, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
, as the date for Koshick to file his brief. The next event shown in the record is that on September 15, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2024AP378-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
. No. 2024AP378-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
Mickey Critton v. Jeffrey W. Jensen
. 1989) (“Appellate review is limited to the record before the appellate court, and we will assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17871 - 2005-04-25
. 1989) (“Appellate review is limited to the record before the appellate court, and we will assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17871 - 2005-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1924-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644643 - 2023-04-13
. No. 2021AP1924-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644643 - 2023-04-13
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31