Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 68530 for did.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 68530 for did.
State v. Leroy A. Yench
that the arresting officer did not exercise “reasonable diligence” to accommodate his request for the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
that the arresting officer did not exercise “reasonable diligence” to accommodate his request for the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Disposition table for September & October 2006
. Roggensack, J., did not participate. 09/11/2006 2004AP1889 State v. Tucker 09/11/2006 2004AP2002
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27175 - 2014-09-15
. Roggensack, J., did not participate. 09/11/2006 2004AP1889 State v. Tucker 09/11/2006 2004AP2002
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27175 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude the circuit court did not err and did not erroneously exercise its discretion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50406 - 2010-05-26
conclude the circuit court did not err and did not erroneously exercise its discretion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50406 - 2010-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Equinees A. Boyles
to make a defense. Second, Boyles claims that his counsel did not investigate or call a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10334 - 2017-09-20
to make a defense. Second, Boyles claims that his counsel did not investigate or call a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10334 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William F. Jorgensen
, 2001. ¶5 On June 15, 2001, Michel sent Jorgensen a letter advising that he did not see any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6647 - 2017-09-20
, 2001. ¶5 On June 15, 2001, Michel sent Jorgensen a letter advising that he did not see any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6647 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Barbara L. Batt v. Guineth L. Sweeney
the only thing she did was verify that the amount was $7700, but that she “did not read other information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4117 - 2017-09-20
the only thing she did was verify that the amount was $7700, but that she “did not read other information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4117 - 2017-09-20
State v. Equinees A. Boyles
was voluntarily giving up his right to make a defense. Second, Boyles claims that his counsel did not investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10334 - 2005-03-31
was voluntarily giving up his right to make a defense. Second, Boyles claims that his counsel did not investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10334 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey H. Bahn
the jury was entitled to hear to avoid speculation as to why the victim did not leave the room in which she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11787 - 2005-03-31
the jury was entitled to hear to avoid speculation as to why the victim did not leave the room in which she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11787 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the incident.” Timm believed his squad camera did record the incident and that the footage would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887952 - 2024-12-11
of the incident.” Timm believed his squad camera did record the incident and that the footage would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887952 - 2024-12-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercised its discretion in making two evidentiary rulings at trial. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50406 - 2014-09-15
exercised its discretion in making two evidentiary rulings at trial. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50406 - 2014-09-15