Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 68532 for did.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 68532 for did.
State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
following Azevedo’s arrest on the grounds that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31
following Azevedo’s arrest on the grounds that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thomas did not testify: he invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege, and refused the State’s offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
. Thomas did not testify: he invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege, and refused the State’s offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
. 2d ___, 665 N.W.2d 305. The findings of fact about what counsel did or did not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
. 2d ___, 665 N.W.2d 305. The findings of fact about what counsel did or did not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5896 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[Joseph’s counsel]: General question. And what did [your father] write to you about? A [Joseph Jr.]: I’ll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3571 - 2005-03-31
[Joseph’s counsel]: General question. And what did [your father] write to you about? A [Joseph Jr.]: I’ll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3571 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
tip to police together with subsequent police observations did not amount to reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45799 - 2010-02-01
tip to police together with subsequent police observations did not amount to reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45799 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-FT 3 seeing her assigned therapist. According to the therapist’s testimony, Laura did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119266 - 2014-09-15
-FT 3 seeing her assigned therapist. According to the therapist’s testimony, Laura did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119266 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
report. We conclude that, insofar as the trial court did not consider every aspect of Sallis’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
report. We conclude that, insofar as the trial court did not consider every aspect of Sallis’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
the trial court erroneously exercised its NO. 96-1734-CR 2 discretion when it did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
the trial court erroneously exercised its NO. 96-1734-CR 2 discretion when it did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In November 2015, Kevin sustained serious injuries in a car accident. He did not have health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
. In November 2015, Kevin sustained serious injuries in a car accident. He did not have health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that § 941.375(2) is unconstitutional as applied in this case. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188087 - 2017-09-21
that § 941.375(2) is unconstitutional as applied in this case. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188087 - 2017-09-21