Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 17557 for ex.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
begin with its plain language. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct. for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58, ¶45
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514466 - 2022-04-28

[PDF] Steven Thomas v. Clinton L. Mallett
is entitled to a remedy for each “wrong.” ¶23 Take, for example, Anwaun A. ex rel. Muwonge v. Heritage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6569 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
and 895.04. Statutory interpretation focuses initially on the language of the statute. State ex rel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113723 - 2017-09-21

WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2254 Complete Title o...
ground). ¶14 Our inquiry “‘begins with the language of the statute.’” See State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65775 - 2011-07-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
] was drinking. I wanted to leave so I called [male name used] to pick me up. He is an ex-boyfriend, now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191156 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with their father’s permission. ¶13 In an oral ruling, the circuit court concluded that, under State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720867 - 2023-10-31

[PDF] NOTICE
divorce judgments, even under … § 801.58(7).” State ex rel. J.H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36131 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 81
transaction. See State ex rel. Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. Board of Review, 74 Wis. 2d 268, 277, 246 N.W.2d 521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201311 - 2018-08-23

WI App 44 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP359 Complete Title of ...
of the statute is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry.’” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78961 - 2012-04-24

State v. Kelly Scott Roberts
and, as such, are subject to the same standards of review as other evidentiary rulings. See State ex rel. Flores v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8228 - 2005-03-31