Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 63608 for records/1000.
Search results 15371 - 15380 of 63608 for records/1000.
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
of the record as mandated by Anders and 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208751 - 2018-02-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208751 - 2018-02-21
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the records, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97143 - 2013-05-16
and an independent review of the records, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97143 - 2013-05-16
John C. Koshick v. State
, as the date for Koshick to file his brief. The next event shown in the record is that on September 15, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
, as the date for Koshick to file his brief. The next event shown in the record is that on September 15, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132987 - 2015-01-11
review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132987 - 2015-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252697 - 2020-01-22
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252697 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456079 - 2021-11-24
-CRNM 2 disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456079 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624006 - 2023-02-21
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624006 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
September 27, 2010
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54787 - 2014-09-15
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54787 - 2014-09-15