Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15381 - 15390 of 68485 for did.
Search results 15381 - 15390 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In November 2015, Kevin sustained serious injuries in a car accident. He did not have health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
. In November 2015, Kevin sustained serious injuries in a car accident. He did not have health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Kearney
of § 940.31(1)(c). Although it allowed much of the testimony of Spierer, the circuit court did not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15010 - 2017-09-21
of § 940.31(1)(c). Although it allowed much of the testimony of Spierer, the circuit court did not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as required by WIS. STAT. § 227.47(1) (2019- 20).1 The court ruled that the department’s decision did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367725 - 2021-05-20
as required by WIS. STAT. § 227.47(1) (2019- 20).1 The court ruled that the department’s decision did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367725 - 2021-05-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercised its discretion in making two evidentiary rulings at trial. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50406 - 2014-09-15
exercised its discretion in making two evidentiary rulings at trial. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50406 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael L. Kearney
it allowed much of the testimony of Spierer, the circuit court did not allow him to testify that Kearney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15010 - 2005-03-31
it allowed much of the testimony of Spierer, the circuit court did not allow him to testify that Kearney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15010 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was permissible because it did not extend the duration of the stop, see Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405, 407
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236503 - 2019-02-28
was permissible because it did not extend the duration of the stop, see Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405, 407
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236503 - 2019-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the duplex but she did not know their names. The neighbor further reported that no one had left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198822 - 2017-10-26
of the duplex but she did not know their names. The neighbor further reported that no one had left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198822 - 2017-10-26
Timothy R. Carney v. Anthony J. Mantuano
that they relied on Anthony's misstatements and that the trial court erred because it did not give this presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9667 - 2005-03-31
that they relied on Anthony's misstatements and that the trial court erred because it did not give this presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ricky McMorris
that the robber had facial hair. Wortock first testified that Jordan said that the robber did not have facial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9434 - 2017-09-19
that the robber had facial hair. Wortock first testified that Jordan said that the robber did not have facial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9434 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Leroy A. Yench
to the Implied Consent Law. On appeal, Yench contends that the arresting officer did not exercise “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
to the Implied Consent Law. On appeal, Yench contends that the arresting officer did not exercise “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19