Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15391 - 15400 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

State v. Daniel H. Frasch
and intelligently entered presents issues of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8864 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6837 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27185 - 2014-09-15

Duffey Law Office v. Tank Transport, Inc.
de novo, we give some deference to the trial court's determinations when a conclusion of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9662 - 2005-03-31

State v. Janusz Daca
. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7360 - 2005-03-31

Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech Information Systems, Inc.
interpretation and application of the statute is de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13991 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Sweat
construe § 973.20(14)(b), STATS.4 Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Willie J. Wroten
we review de novo. Id. No. 00-3385-CR 4 Plea Withdrawal. ¶6 After sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19

William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31