Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15391 - 15400 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15391 - 15400 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. James Ward
of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428792 - 2021-09-22
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428792 - 2021-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Mark Andrew Rea
is subject to our de novo review. In Interest of Michael R. B., 175 Wis.2d 713, 720, 499 N.W.2d 641, 644
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8110 - 2017-09-19
is subject to our de novo review. In Interest of Michael R. B., 175 Wis.2d 713, 720, 499 N.W.2d 641, 644
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8110 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. See Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428, 734 N.W.2d 411
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49635 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428, 734 N.W.2d 411
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49635 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Williams
to criminal proceedings by § 972.11(1), STATS.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
to criminal proceedings by § 972.11(1), STATS.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, certiorari review is confined to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-29
, certiorari review is confined to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
Gregory Thornton v. City of Milwaukee
by qualified privilege is a question of law that we review de novo. Forman v. Richmond Police Dept., 104 F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5648 - 2017-09-19
by qualified privilege is a question of law that we review de novo. Forman v. Richmond Police Dept., 104 F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5648 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michelle S.
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586, 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3318 - 2005-03-31
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586, 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3318 - 2005-03-31