Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15391 - 15400 of 30164 for de.

[PDF] State v. James J. Mischler
of a statute. The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12701 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Reginold B. Trussell
and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Randy J. G.
demonstrating the blood test results. Randy appeals. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9607 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ricardo Miramontes-Santos
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5108 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Randall G. Bobholz v. John Banaszak
commissioner ruled in favor of Bobholz for $4220. Banaszak requested a trial de novo. Following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5235 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that Boyd directly committed the robbery when it stated that he “came back into the store” was a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11 In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82322 - 2014-09-15

Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
of discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We must sustain the March 14, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. No. 2013AP891-CR 4 ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21