Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15401 - 15410 of 65885 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 15401 - 15410 of 65885 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Raymond J. Rappa
based his sentence in part on evidence not in the record. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5325 - 2005-03-31
based his sentence in part on evidence not in the record. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5325 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
decision to waive juvenile jurisdiction was “unsupported by the record” because, he contends, “no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reimbursement” fee which appears in the judgment of conviction, but which was not discussed on the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175513 - 2017-09-21
reimbursement” fee which appears in the judgment of conviction, but which was not discussed on the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175513 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2018AP2385-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2018AP2385-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the criteria on the record.” Further, we have stated that “the [circuit] court must exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407659 - 2021-08-11
to the criteria on the record.” Further, we have stated that “the [circuit] court must exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407659 - 2021-08-11
State v. Jamie S.
, and if the judge determines on the record that it is established "by clear and convincing evidence that if it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11739 - 2005-03-31
, and if the judge determines on the record that it is established "by clear and convincing evidence that if it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11739 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel’s no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94654 - 2014-09-15
counsel’s no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94654 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kevin D. Waite
arguments together. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10609 - 2005-03-31
arguments together. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10609 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143231 - 2015-06-15
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143231 - 2015-06-15