Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15411 - 15420 of 49833 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
mistakes. On appeal, our review of a sentence imposed by the circuit court is limited to determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135176 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Sec. 102.23(6). Our role involves the narrow task of searching the record for evidence that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30104 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶11 Although our decision in Cherry was relatively recent, our reversal was because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42670 - 2009-10-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 1998). Our review is limited to determining whether: (1) the agency stayed within its jurisdiction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197082 - 2017-10-04

State v. Steven A. Johnson
. Johnson challenges the discretion the trial court exercised at sentencing and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9946 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peter Edge
. As is evident from the standard of review set forth in Carviou and Marhal, our role on review is quite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10608 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] James R. Matlouck v. Randall R. Hepp
certiorari relief. DISCUSSION ¶3 Our certiorari review of administrative proceedings is confined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26583 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
these decisions that our supreme court “concluded that the sentencing court had erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
due to incompetence. Based on our review of the record, we are satisfied that counsel’s no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178530 - 2017-09-21

State v. Rodger A. Dierks
." Sentencing is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and our review is limited to determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9415 - 2005-03-31