Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15421 - 15430 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15421 - 15430 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-representation has been violated is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Darby, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
-representation has been violated is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Darby, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
CA Blank Order
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
question which we review de novo. ¶7 Cottingham first argues that trial counsel failed to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
question which we review de novo. ¶7 Cottingham first argues that trial counsel failed to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36117 - 2009-04-08
a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36117 - 2009-04-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
the background of this crime and DuPuis’ prior record, these alleged errors are de minimis. DuPuis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31408 - 2014-09-15
the background of this crime and DuPuis’ prior record, these alleged errors are de minimis. DuPuis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31408 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208808 - 2018-02-21
the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208808 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo, giving weight to the circuit court’s decision because the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234404 - 2019-02-13
is a question of law that we review de novo, giving weight to the circuit court’s decision because the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234404 - 2019-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
voluntary is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, since the trial court “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21
voluntary is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, since the trial court “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21