Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15421 - 15430 of 97585 for court records search online.
Search results 15421 - 15430 of 97585 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was neither any evidence in the record nor any factual finding by the court showing “how the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491852 - 2022-03-10
that there was neither any evidence in the record nor any factual finding by the court showing “how the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491852 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record indicating, contrary to the circuit court’s observation, that M.S. had not always been certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117312 - 2017-09-21
in the record indicating, contrary to the circuit court’s observation, that M.S. had not always been certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this court to order a new trial “if it appears from the record that the real controversy has not been fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195512 - 2017-09-21
this court to order a new trial “if it appears from the record that the real controversy has not been fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195512 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
a court cannot require release of a record that does not exist. ¶7 We conclude that under the facts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143337 - 2015-06-17
a court cannot require release of a record that does not exist. ¶7 We conclude that under the facts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143337 - 2015-06-17
[PDF]
Frontsheet
). (a) The requester may bring an action for mandamus asking a court to order release of the record. The court may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143337 - 2017-09-21
). (a) The requester may bring an action for mandamus asking a court to order release of the record. The court may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143337 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2012
. The circuit court concluded that the legal bills were not “records” under § 19.32(2) because they were
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86731 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court concluded that the legal bills were not “records” under § 19.32(2) because they were
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” However, as Landmark points out and as the circuit court noted, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908199 - 2025-01-30
.” However, as Landmark points out and as the circuit court noted, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908199 - 2025-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” However, as Landmark points out and as the circuit court noted, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927852 - 2025-03-13
.” However, as Landmark points out and as the circuit court noted, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927852 - 2025-03-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Our review of the record shows that the trial court did just that. With regard to the first factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195688 - 2017-09-21
Our review of the record shows that the trial court did just that. With regard to the first factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195688 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 20, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175055 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 20, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175055 - 2017-09-21