Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15421 - 15430 of 59015 for quit claim deed.
Search results 15421 - 15430 of 59015 for quit claim deed.
City of New Berlin v. Timothy J. Goba
. Goba first claims that he was denied his right to an alternate test. He raised this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11341 - 2005-03-31
. Goba first claims that he was denied his right to an alternate test. He raised this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11341 - 2005-03-31
Dennis Stensaas v. Jeffrey Becker
. The trial court concluded that the Stensaases did not have an unjust enrichment claim against Becker. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8290 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court concluded that the Stensaases did not have an unjust enrichment claim against Becker. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8290 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34292 - 2008-10-14
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34292 - 2008-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
procedural bar applies to a postconviction claim is a question of law entitled to independent review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35277 - 2009-01-20
procedural bar applies to a postconviction claim is a question of law entitled to independent review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35277 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34292 - 2014-09-15
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34292 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
to Fritz’s parents. Frank claimed that Fritz’s parents were negligent in entrusting their vehicle to him.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12375 - 2017-09-21
to Fritz’s parents. Frank claimed that Fritz’s parents were negligent in entrusting their vehicle to him.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Childeric Maxy v. Julia Meyer
VERGERONT, P.J. 1 Childeric Maxy, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order dismissing his small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3506 - 2017-09-19
VERGERONT, P.J. 1 Childeric Maxy, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order dismissing his small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3506 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
raising these claims.2 The postconviction court rejected Burns’ arguments on a number of bases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91386 - 2014-09-15
raising these claims.2 The postconviction court rejected Burns’ arguments on a number of bases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91386 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court concluded Garrison’s claims were precluded by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51613 - 2010-07-06
. The court concluded Garrison’s claims were precluded by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51613 - 2010-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion, claiming the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by rejecting the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100721 - 2013-08-12
postconviction motion, claiming the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by rejecting the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100721 - 2013-08-12