Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15431 - 15440 of 57577 for a i x.
Search results 15431 - 15440 of 57577 for a i x.
State v. Gary Bryant
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11928 - 2005-03-31
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11928 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court rejected counsel’s proposal stating: I don’t believe, and as a result of this sentence I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
, the court rejected counsel’s proposal stating: I don’t believe, and as a result of this sentence I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, each of the reports contain[s] an enormous amount of information that was not presented to the jury. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
, each of the reports contain[s] an enormous amount of information that was not presented to the jury. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. SYLVESTER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32278 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. SYLVESTER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32278 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 38
KELLY, J. (dissenting). I agree that this rule would be beneficial, but I do not believe we have
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258376 - 2020-04-17
KELLY, J. (dissenting). I agree that this rule would be beneficial, but I do not believe we have
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258376 - 2020-04-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this appeal, the circuit court stated the following during its discussion of the sentencing factors: I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212886 - 2018-05-15
to this appeal, the circuit court stated the following during its discussion of the sentencing factors: I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212886 - 2018-05-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the postconviction motion hearing, “I made it clear on the record that I thought the sentence I was giving Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-15
in the postconviction motion hearing, “I made it clear on the record that I thought the sentence I was giving Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
argument would lead to an absurd result under § 969.02, I affirm the decision of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93763 - 2013-03-06
argument would lead to an absurd result under § 969.02, I affirm the decision of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93763 - 2013-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2008AP629 Cir. Ct. No. 1996CF960856 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
. Appeal No. 2008AP629 Cir. Ct. No. 1996CF960856 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
State v. Andrea D. Williams
said: More importantly, his reaction to the situation. I can’t believe I did this. I can’t believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26165 - 2006-08-09
said: More importantly, his reaction to the situation. I can’t believe I did this. I can’t believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26165 - 2006-08-09