Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
of discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We must sustain the March 14, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31
of discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We must sustain the March 14, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31
Marty H. Coopman v. American Family Insurance Company
and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12264 - 2005-03-31
and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frankie Kirk Rottier v. John Edward Walsh
. Co., 222 Wis.2d 627, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14977 - 2017-09-21
. Co., 222 Wis.2d 627, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14977 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John Paul
review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶10 On the performance prong, we determine whether trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4051 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶10 On the performance prong, we determine whether trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4051 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
of whether an identification procedure denied a defendant due-process is a question of law, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10432 - 2017-09-20
of whether an identification procedure denied a defendant due-process is a question of law, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10432 - 2017-09-20
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
RDAR’s late appeal. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶9 On certiorari review, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084744 - 2026-03-03
RDAR’s late appeal. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶9 On certiorari review, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084744 - 2026-03-03
Jessica Smith v. Nikolas H. Markos
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory and constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
the statutory and constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26