Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
[PDF]
John A. P. v. Family Service of Waukesha
reasonable conclusion can be drawn, the question is one of law that we review de novo. A conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12035 - 2017-09-21
reasonable conclusion can be drawn, the question is one of law that we review de novo. A conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12035 - 2017-09-21
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6201 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6201 - 2005-03-31
Marshfield Machine Corporation v. Bernard Martin
for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case, de novo. American Family Mut. Ins. v. Dobrzynski, 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2395 - 2005-03-31
for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case, de novo. American Family Mut. Ins. v. Dobrzynski, 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2395 - 2005-03-31
Jessica Smith v. Nikolas H. Markos
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph Keepers
reviews de novo. See id. at 634. ¶10 Keepers argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See id. at 634. ¶10 Keepers argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 592. Then, we review de novo how those facts apply to a constitutional standard. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59276 - 2011-01-25
N.W.2d 592. Then, we review de novo how those facts apply to a constitutional standard. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59276 - 2011-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. John
. This is a constitutional question we decide de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 715, 345 N.W.2d 457, 465 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
. This is a constitutional question we decide de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 715, 345 N.W.2d 457, 465 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15