Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
State v. James W. Whistleman
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603 N.W.2d 732 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603 N.W.2d 732 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joe J. Davis
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310 (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2256 - 2017-09-19
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310 (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10245 - 2017-09-20
not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10245 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
[PDF]
John A. P. v. Family Service of Waukesha
reasonable conclusion can be drawn, the question is one of law that we review de novo. A conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12035 - 2017-09-21
reasonable conclusion can be drawn, the question is one of law that we review de novo. A conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12035 - 2017-09-21
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6201 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6201 - 2005-03-31
Marshfield Machine Corporation v. Bernard Martin
for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case, de novo. American Family Mut. Ins. v. Dobrzynski, 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2395 - 2005-03-31
for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case, de novo. American Family Mut. Ins. v. Dobrzynski, 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2395 - 2005-03-31
Jessica Smith v. Nikolas H. Markos
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31