Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30066 for de.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 30066 for de.
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 26, 32, 330 N.W.2d 201 (1983), and which we analyze de novo, Heritage Mut. Ins. v. Truck Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190420 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 26, 32, 330 N.W.2d 201 (1983), and which we analyze de novo, Heritage Mut. Ins. v. Truck Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190420 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
are questions of law we determine de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. If McClellan fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law we determine de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. If McClellan fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal determination that this court decides de novo. See id. We need not address both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214655 - 2018-06-26
is a legal determination that this court decides de novo. See id. We need not address both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214655 - 2018-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
there was ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100715 - 2013-08-12
there was ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100715 - 2013-08-12
Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
of discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We must sustain the March 14, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31
of discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We must sustain the March 14, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
was adequate to justify nondisclosure. We consider de novo whether the public interest in nondisclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8181 - 2017-09-19
was adequate to justify nondisclosure. We consider de novo whether the public interest in nondisclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8181 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a prosecutor’s conduct constitutes “overreaching,” however, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684551 - 2023-08-02
that a prosecutor’s conduct constitutes “overreaching,” however, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684551 - 2023-08-02
State v. Charles W. Randle
of § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Liebnitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
of § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Liebnitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31