Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 29810 for des.
Search results 15441 - 15450 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
Firstar Trust Company v. Richard D. Gebhardt
6 II. DISCUSSION We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo. See Grosskopf Oil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13072 - 2017-09-21
6 II. DISCUSSION We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo. See Grosskopf Oil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13072 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ernie Garibay v. Circuit Court for Kenosha County
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jose Trevino
this is a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. State v. Dodson, 219 Wis.2d 65, 69, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12630 - 2017-09-21
this is a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. State v. Dodson, 219 Wis.2d 65, 69, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Randle
application of § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
application of § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to interpret and apply WIS. STAT. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87, ¶42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46026 - 2014-09-15
to interpret and apply WIS. STAT. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87, ¶42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46026 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27488 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W.2d 443 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
.2d 592. Then, we review de novo how those facts apply to a constitutional standard. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59276 - 2014-09-15
.2d 592. Then, we review de novo how those facts apply to a constitutional standard. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59276 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). Consequently, our de novo appellate review of an arbitration award is very limited. It is designed primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101464 - 2013-08-28
). Consequently, our de novo appellate review of an arbitration award is very limited. It is designed primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101464 - 2013-08-28
CA Blank Order
determination of whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106016 - 2013-12-19
determination of whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106016 - 2013-12-19